★ Tripadvisor Travelers’ Choice 2016–2026·Caucasus record holders · Paragliding World Cup pilots·Online support 09:00–21:00 (GMT+4)
SkyAtlantidaSKYATLANTIDAGUDAURI · GEORGIA TG Calculator
Open 09:00–21:00 (GMT+4)
+995 551 355 000
ENGRUS
Flights
Academy
Activities
Tours
Stay
About
Open 09:00–21:00 (GMT+4) · +995 551 355 000
Online school · Advanced Pilot · module 1 of 4

XC-day weather: forecast and strategy

You already fly on your own and can read a one-day forecast. A route needs something else: understanding the weather three days ahead, working out the window hour by hour, and knowing where the day will break before your eyes see it. In this module we cover the strategy of an XC day — from the synoptic chart to the decision to turn back.

⏱ 90 min📖 21 sections✓ 50 questions

The three-day forecast: you choose the day, not the route

In the basic module we covered how to tell from a forecast whether today is a flying day. On a route the question is a different one. Not “am I flying” but “where to, how far, and until what hour”. The answer to that is assembled not in the morning but three days ahead.

Three days out, a model does not yet know the details. It already guesses reasonably well which pressure system will sit over the area and where a front will go. But the exact hour the front passes, the height of the base and the strength of the lift are beyond it at that range. To demand such figures from it is to deceive yourself.

So at three days out you ask only the large questions:

  • Which system is coming — a high, a trough, a front?
  • Where will the air flow from: the sea, the plains, the north across the range?
  • Should you expect precipitation and thunderstorms in the area of the route?
  • Which of the next few days looks better than the rest?

Look separately at the spread of the ensemble. An ensemble is when the same model is run several dozen times, changing the initial data slightly each time. Usually 20 to 50 runs are used. If they all draw a similar picture, the model is confident. If the runs diverge, there is no confidence, and it is too early to plan a long route for that day.

RangeWhat question you settleWhat not to expect from the forecast
3 days outWhich day of the week is flyable. Logistics, transport up, a flying partnerExact hours and heights
2 days outThe direction of the route and the alternativeThe strength of the lift
The day beforeThe working window, the ceiling, the latest landing timeHow a particular slope will behave
In the morningDo we go or not, and along which lineAnything beyond what you observe on site
A fine point for pros. Look not only at the latest model run but at the two before it. If each new run moves the front by half a day, the model is rewriting itself. A day like that is planned as a short one: an out-and-return route, not a one-way line.
Case study. It is Wednesday and you are looking at Saturday. One model gives a ridge of high pressure and dry air, the other a trough with precipitation. The ensemble has diverged: half the runs are dry, half are wet. What the pilot sees: a pretty picture in the app and the temptation to buy a lift ticket in advance. The answer: Saturday is not planned as an XC day but kept as a fallback. The main plan goes on Sunday, where the runs agree.

The synoptic chart: what the pressure system promises a route

A synoptic chart is a chart of surface pressure with fronts on it. The lines of equal pressure on it are called isobars. For a pilot it answers a question that no app addresses: why today will be the way it will be.

You read it in four steps.

  1. Find the centres: H for high pressure, L for low. In the northern hemisphere the air goes clockwise around a high and anticlockwise around a low.
  2. Look at how tightly packed the isobars are. Closer lines mean stronger wind. The figures on the isobars are secondary; what matters is the spacing between them.
  3. Find the fronts. A blue line with triangles is cold, a red one with semicircles is warm, a purple one with both is an occlusion — that is, the cold front has caught up with the warm one.
  4. Find the trough — an elongated tongue of low pressure. On the chart it is a black line with no symbols. A trough means unstable, turbulent air and showers.

What each system gives a route.

SystemAirWhat the route gets
The centre of a highSubsides and warmsA subsidence inversion, a low ceiling, a blue sky, weak lift
The edge of a high, a ridgeModerately stableOften the best option: light wind, cumulus present, no overdevelopment
Behind a cold frontFresh, cold aloftStrong lift, a high base, a risk of overdevelopment and squalls
The warm sectorWarm and humidLow cloud, drizzle, hardly any thermal activity
A troughUnstableShowers and thunderstorms, a ragged window

For an XC pilot the second day after a cold front has passed matters most. On the first day the air is too fresh and ragged, the lift punches, and the cumulus grows into towers. On the second or third day high pressure builds over the area, the air subsides and dries out. The lift becomes smoother, and the inversion above stops the clouds overdeveloping. That is the classic XC day.

A fine point for pros. The same system gives different weather depending on where you are relative to its centre. A ridge of high pressure sitting directly over you kills the thermal activity. The same ridge, 300–400 km away, leaves you moderate stability above and working lift below — exactly what a route needs.
Case study. On the chart a cold front passed yesterday evening and a ridge is building behind it. The isobars are widely spaced and the wind at 700 hPa is around 15 km/h. What the pilot sees: a clear morning and a cheerful mood. The answer: this is the second day after the front, the best of the next three. Plan a long route, but with an early launch — the ridge will strengthen, and tomorrow the ceiling will drop.

The air mass and its history: where today’s air came from

Two reports with identical figures can produce completely different days. The difference is set not by today’s temperature but by the history of the air: where it was born and what happened to it on the way.

Masses are classified by two features. The first is humidity: maritime or continental. The second is the temperature of the source: arctic, polar or tropical. A maritime polar mass arrives humid and cool; a continental tropical one dry and warm.

Then the mass changes on its way. The rule is short and it works:

  • Cold air travelling over a warm surface is heated from below and becomes unstable. Cumulus, showers, good visibility between them. For a route that is a strong but ragged day.
  • Warm air travelling over a cold surface is cooled from below and becomes stable. Layer cloud, haze, fog. There will be no route.

Five things work on changing a mass: the temperature difference between the air and the surface, moisture added by evaporation and lost as precipitation, the terrain along the way, the shape of the track and its age — the longer a mass has been travelling, the less is left in it of its source.

How to look at the history of the air in practice. Take a wind chart for the 700 hPa level, which is about 3,000 m, and wind it back a day. That is where the air came from. Passed over the sea — expect moisture and a low base. Came down off the northern ranges — dry and cold aloft, and the lift will be strong. Crossed the mountains with precipitation — on our side it will arrive dry and warm, and that is already a conversation about the föhn.

A fine point for pros. Pilots often read the surface temperature as an indicator of how strong the day will be. It lies. What makes a day is not the warmth at the ground but the difference between the ground and the air aloft. A warm morning with warm air aloft gives a sluggish day; a cool morning with cold air aloft gives a strong one. Look at the temperature at 700 hPa, not at the thermometer at launch.
Case study. Two July days, +18 °C at launch both times. On the first it was +4 °C at 3,000 m, on the second −2 °C. What the pilot sees: the same thermometer and the same sky at eight in the morning. What is not accounted for: on the second day the difference is 6 degrees greater and the air is far more unstable. The answer: on the first day, a short route along the sunny slopes; on the second, an early launch, a long line and a hard watch on the growth of the clouds.

The emagram of an XC day: working out not “will we fly” but “how far”

In the basic module we covered how to find the top of the thermals and the cloudbase on an emagram. On a route more is asked of the same graph: it has to tell you the thickness of the working layer and the quality of the sky along the whole line.

Four things to look for on the emagram of an XC day.

  1. The thickness of the convective layer. That is the distance from the ground to the top of the thermals. In the practice of soaring forecast services a layer of 1,500 m or more is considered favourable. The real working ceiling is usually a little below the calculated one: near the upper limit the lift is already weak.
  2. The spread at the level of the ceiling. The difference between temperature and dew point up there decides what the sky will be like. A benchmark from practice: 2–4 °C gives handsome high cumulus. Less than 2 °C and the clouds spread into an unbroken sheet, and the day switches itself off. More, and the sky will be blue, with no clouds to read.
  3. The dryness of the upper level. If the temperature and dew-point curves diverge by 10–15 °C or more up there, expect no high cloud and no storm towers.
  4. Stable layers inside. Every bend of the curve to the right is a step at which the day will stop and wait.

Working it out step by step. The example is for teaching; the figures are taken to demonstrate the calculation, not for a particular day.

  • The environmental curve gives −2 °C at 2,800 m.
  • Launch is at 2,200 m. The difference is 600 m.
  • The dry adiabat is 1 °C per 100 m, that is, 6 °C over 600 m.
  • Trigger temperature for the 2,800 m level: −2 + 6 = +4 °C at launch.
  • The forecast gives a maximum of +7 °C. There is a margin, and the lift will reach above 2,800 m.
  • Temperature at launch +7 °C, dew point −3 °C. Spread 10 °C. Base ≈ 10 × 125 = 1,250 m above launch, that is, around 3,450 m.

Then compare the base with the ceiling of the area. In Gudauri the ceiling of the UGA8 paragliding area is 10,500 ft (3,200 m). So in this example it is not the cloud that limits you but the rule.

A fine point for pros. The emagram for an XC day is read not at one point but at three: over launch, over the middle of the line and over the finish area. Models give a computed sounding for any point. The difference between those three graphs is your route forecast: where the layer is thicker, where the spread closes earlier, where an inversion sits.
Case study. The sounding over launch gives a 1,600 m layer and a spread of 3 °C at the top — an excellent day. The sounding over a point 30 km along the route shows a spread of 1.5 °C. What the pilot sees at launch: high, even cumulus and the urge to set off along the line. The answer: you cannot go that way, the sky there will close up by the middle of the day. The route is turned in the opposite direction, where the spread stays workable.

What follows is for our students

The full module text, the practice sessions and the exams are open to those who train with us. Access is included in the course fee: it runs for the whole course and for three months after it ends.

If you are training with us now, or have trained with us before, sign in with your access code. If you are a pilot from another school, access can be bought separately.

Language: the sections above are in English. Behind the code the full module text and the question bank are currently in Russian — the English versions are being prepared.

The material prepares you for the theory exam of the national paragliding federation, but it does not replace practice with an instructor. The pilot licence is issued by the federation after its own exams. Book a course.